![]() On the Enterprise especially, the lighting does so much of the work in setting the tone on the ship. Visions of the future in the 1960s tended towards bright, bold colors, and Star Trek didn't have CG to create detailed imaginary backdrops. But Quake 2 RTX's aesthetic, in its most dramatically lit corners, is pure Star Trek: The Original Series. The original game was James Cameron's Aliens, rendered in the finest detail that 12 megabytes of video memory could produce. When Nvidia's designers really went over-the-top with colored lighting, I realized they had changed the kind of sci-fi Quake 2 evokes. Ray tracing helps iron out some of Quake 2's more tedious moments and just generally make its spaces more interesting to explore. I got lost in the hallways more than once, and would've spent way more time wandering in vain without the lights to guide me. Unlike Quake 1's standalone levels, Quake 2 uses a hub design, where you're frequently backtracking through previous areas after completing a secondary objective. The colorful lighting isn't just for show-it quickly became the way I navigated the corridors of the Strogg base, remembering I needed to pass through a striking red room to get back to a previously locked door. Playing Quake 2 RTX absolutely gives Quake 2 a different feel, but I think it uses the technology in ways id's developers would've tried themselves if they could have back in 1997. This changes what it's like to explore the nooks and crannies of the Strogg base, giving it a bit more of the horror vibe id would later go for in Doom 3. Where there isn't an in-world light source, you have to supply your own. ![]() For example, Nvidia added a flare gun into the game to make it easier to see in the dark-a vital tool in Quake 2 RTX, because the dark is now really dark. Just look at this difference between a couple rooms:īut after a few hours, it started to seep in that this stuff wasn't just eye candy. It wields ray traced lighting like an artist who's just been miraculously cured of color blindness, drenching one corridor in purple, another in sickly green. If there's one thing id Software games absolutely never needed, it's subtly.Īnd Quake 2 RTX is not subtle. ![]() And it gets in the way of the satisfying flow from one headshot to the next. "Subtle" for the time was probably referencing the fact that some enemies will double over in pain when you shoot them, which in 1998 passed for realism but in 2021 is a little comical when it happens every single time. PC Gamer called it "the most sensational and subtle shooter ever" in a 1998 list of the 50 best games of all time, where it took third place. It was still amazing tech for 1997, of course. There are wall sconces and bits of colored lighting here and there, but they never stand out, or cast a glow throughout the room they're in. Quake 2's color palette is dominated by browns and grays, with the occasional exciting bit of glowing red lava. Quake 2 RTX's simple geometry and textures put all the focus on the lighting, and in doing so completely transform the game. The lighting and reflections may look amazing, but everything else is already so detailed it's hard for them to really stand out. This all makes absolutely NO SENSE to anyone I've mentioned it to.In modern cutting-edge games like Control or Cyberpunk 2077, ray tracing is like the shiny cherry on top of a realism sundae. I go through this BS everytime I have to upgrade my video card.Ĭosts me a fortune, as I have to sell the cards that I cannot use to lwoer prices to ppl on eBay etc.Īs for refresh rate, I have to use at least 100hz.Īlso, I've had two Sony 100Hz TVs. If I use Powerstrip to set the refresh rate, I get sick on all monitors and all video ards. For example, ATi cards I cannot use with any monitors. Samsung was the only one I could use for more than 20min at the time.Īgain, only with certain video cards. I must have had 12-15 monitors in the past 3 years. all those cards have the same GPU, the same memory, the same chips, the same outputs.Īnd to top that off, I can only use Samsung CRT monitors (with that MSi card). 'Cos the MSi is the only one that I don't get dizzy/sick and massive headaches from! So why did I have so many of the exact same cards, you ask? One that optometrists, doctors of various sorts, monitor producers etc can't even explain.īefore getting this, I had a Gainward Geforce 6800GT, an Asus Geforce 6800GT, a Point-of-View Geforce 6800GT and one more which I can't recall the brand of. I could tell you stories you won't believe. ![]() Yeah, it's absolutely the rolling more than the bobbing.Īm I sensitive when it comes to refrsh rates? Hell-fucking-yeah!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |